Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E420B5DC1C for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:30:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33814-03 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:30:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C86FEB5DC00 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:30:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2011 19:30:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [192.168.1.100]) [2.208.53.105] by mail.gmx.net (mp068) with SMTP; 13 Sep 2011 21:30:18 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1200273 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Xxy8jMW/XtwrLNsKZ1m1cx+ALMlaIB9VUl4G0xC uYER+dd6/i9Gmc Message-ID: <4E6FAF4F.2030801@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:30:23 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gunthard_St=FCbs?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: exit code 139 performing initdb (pg 9.1 on linux) References: <4E6F7ED7.9050000@gmx.de> <8602.1315934756@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4E6F9CD4.9000705@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4E6F9CD4.9000705@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.789 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201109/84 X-Sequence-Number: 38321 sorry, I first used for gdb the pg path Tom wrote and not my own one... the correct backtrace looks like this: #3 0x082676a1 in pg_flush_data (fd=9, offset=0, amount=57344) at fd.c:335 #4 0x0826ab02 in copy_file (fromfile=0xbfffeb90 "base/1/12051", tofile=0xbfffe790 "base/12277/12051") at copydir.c:205 #5 0x0826a743 in copydir (fromdir=0x85f26ec "base/1", todir=0x85f4dbc "base/12277", recurse=0 '\0') at copydir.c:95 #6 0x08169b6b in createdb (stmt=0x4b) at dbcommands.c:587 #7 0x0828d761 in PortalRunUtility (portal=0x85f055c, utilityStmt=0x85acae8, isTopLevel=1 '\001', dest=0x84f0058, completionTag=0xbffff3f0 "") at pquery.c:1184 #8 0x0828d865 in PortalRunMulti (portal=0x85f055c, isTopLevel=1 '\001', dest=0x84f0058, altdest=0x84f0058, completionTag=0xbffff3f0 "") at pquery.c:1322 #9 0x0828d1b1 in PortalRun (portal=0x85f055c, count=2147483647, isTopLevel=1 '\001', dest=0x84f0058, altdest=0x84f0058, completionTag=0xbffff3f0 "") at pquery.c:813 #10 0x082881b3 in exec_simple_query (query_string=0x85ac19c "CREATE DATABASE template0;\n") at postgres.c:1018 #11 0x0828bcb3 in PostgresMain (argc=9, argv=0xbffff550, username=0x85ac19c "CREATE DATABASE template0;\n") at postgres.c:3926 #12 0x081e3051 in main (argc=9, argv=0x85373d8) at main.c:197 I would be glad to know whether there is a chance to get pg running under these conditions or whether maybe i should upgrade gcc or 'downgrade' pg. best regards, gunthard