Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECDBB5DBD9 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:39:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34380-07 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:39:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:39:01.749828 by SQLgrey-1.8.0-rc2 Received: from mout9.freenet.de (mout9.freenet.de [195.4.92.99]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEFBB5DBD8 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:39:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout9.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID jan.lentfer@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #6) id 1RGz79-0007dq-5m for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:21:19 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:57129 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID jan.lentfer@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1RGz79-00022D-1m for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:21:19 +0200 Received: from [195.4.92.12] (port=51556 helo=2.mx.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID jan.lentfer@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1RGz53-0005gT-GR for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:19:09 +0200 Received: from p579b7197.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.155.113.151]:58891 helo=epia.lan.net) by 2.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID jan.lentfer@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1RGz53-0006dI-6n for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:19:09 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by epia.lan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207A7C7249181 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:19:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lan.net Received: from epia.lan.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (epia.lan.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MbBtZIcHxd1A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:19:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.93.75.6] (unknown [10.93.75.6]) by epia.lan.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4CF41C72491E7 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:19:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4EA08235.2010106@web.de> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:19:01 +0200 From: Jan Lentfer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.868 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201110/98 X-Sequence-Number: 38550 Am 20.10.2011 22:10, schrieb Scott Marlowe: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Mark Steben > wrote: >> Hi all, >> I'm evaluating the check_postgres program. We are running postgres 8.3. >> Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they would >> like to share? I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat' program >> but >> would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres. > I use it, it works fine, lots of development. Note that bloat > checking is only as accurate as your last analyze. > Same here, work great imho. -- professional: http://www.oscar-consult.de private: http://neslonek.homeunix.org/drupal/