Message-ID: <4F8BDAB2.7010209@frank.uvena.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:39:14 +0200
From: Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
	rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Recreate primary key without dropping foreign keys?
References: <4F8B6AA1.1040709@zvelo.com>
	<20120416065717.70a31a6361ac5d7bdad416e8@frank.uvena.de>
	<4F8BD91C.6070405@zvelo.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F8BD91C.6070405@zvelo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 16.04.2012 10:32, schrieb Chris Ernst:
> On 04/15/2012 10:57 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:41:05 -0600 Chris Ernst <cernst@zvelo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> In PostgreSQL 9.1.3, I have a few fairly large tables with
>>> bloated primary key indexes.  I'm trying to replace them using
>>> newly created unique indexes as outlined in the docs.  Something
>>> like:
>>>
>>> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX CONCURRENTLY dist_id_temp_idx ON
>>> distributors (dist_id); ALTER TABLE distributors DROP CONSTRAINT
>>> distributors_pkey, ADD CONSTRAINT distributors_pkey PRIMARY KEY
>>> USING INDEX dist_id_temp_idx;
>>>
>>> However, the initial drop of the primary key constraint fails
>>> because there are a whole bunch of foreign keys depending on it.
>>>
>>> I've done some searching and haven't found a workable solution.
>>> Is there any way to swap in the new index for the primary key
>>> constraint without dropping all dependent foreign keys?  Or am I
>>> pretty much stuck with dropping and recreating all of the foreign
>>> keys?
>>
>> REINDEX is not working here?
> 
> Hi Frank,
> 
> Thanks, but REINDEX is not an option as it would take an exclusive
> lock on the table for several hours.

Well, from my little view I guess all rebuilding index action would
require such, as its the primary key with uniqueness. I'd think of a
complete reinit of the cluster with pg_dump and restoring, but this
would also need a downtime at least for write access.

Why is the index so bloated?

Cheers,
Frank