Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C53C635408 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:36:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22859-03-4 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:36:01 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qy0-f106.google.com (mail-qy0-f106.google.com [209.85.221.106]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB4B63343C for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:36:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so70720qyk.15 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:36:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=274y/mfRY0ej4VwtfwaMEhfcUxgqIpQaFiGuQszrtho=; b=JaTXgVqsO22qRyTVRYVc+3nei8znLxe9CfOYLVZxl9NxQuZKztDc/qWsgEfwuMV8F1 T/qob8gZQGJrj/1f0v0EUUTC2ca+ETgkzFLB2EE8SuO3xQqlv9RuNwZXsGvksLtDOZrw nyzEcmIrLibxheulo+w+apBtBHS3E3WJolvCQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=h1Jvpn8svUPxJVaJV4MNAzBhu9ynO/rEB8Kg4ocxnl95ojxc1GW5KalYjPm0kc2bbz ENpQlwSwxJdYAOlnqTMeXzkkCirHPy1bWXiCTVgzxoI4RanmgBR7Qr/ty4wPLJo1HqvN Nyyoa4InUHLHBZoEkZJsEwYTmWHbapGhKSj1E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.74.81 with SMTP id t17mr114694vcj.56.1237300565868; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:36:05 -0300 Message-ID: <4bb7c9f80903170736k3416b743me44c42ca847a3d89@mail.gmail.com> Subject: vacuum From: Ygor Degani To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163628517cb5889d0465517c8b X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/191 X-Sequence-Number: 31691 --00163628517cb5889d0465517c8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit People, I have three databases in different machines: a pgsql server version 8.2.4, a pgsql server version 8.1.4 and another pgsql client version 8.3.5. Is there a problem to make vacuum with client newer than server? For example: To use vacuumdb of client version 8.3.5 to make vacuum in server 8.2.4 or in server 8.1.4. Regards, -- Ygor Degani --00163628517cb5889d0465517c8b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable People,

I have three databases in different machines: a pgsql server= version 8.2.4, a pgsql server version 8.1.4 and another pgsql client versi= on 8.3.5.
Is there a problem to make vacuum with client newer than serv= er? For example: To use vacuumdb of client version 8.3.5 to make vacuum in = server 8.2.4 or in server 8.1.4.

Regards,

--
Ygor Degani
--00163628517cb5889d0465517c8b--