Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T5OvK-0007Kj-31 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:33:46 +0000 Received: from ks215171.kimsufi.com ([188.165.251.98]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T5OvI-000320-1J for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:33:45 +0000 Received: from [192.168.222.14] (dslb-084-060-246-184.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.246.184]) (authenticated bits=0) by ks215171.kimsufi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q7PMXcOn002948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:33:40 +0200 Message-ID: <503952C2.6080805@longimanus.net> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:33:38 +0200 From: Andreas Schmitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Canot access PostgreSQL via psql -h (Vmware Fusion) References: <64CA6636-C7A2-4305-8A06-A133DEEFEAE7@consistentstate.com> <503744920200002500049ADE@gw.wicourts.gov> <20231.1345818954@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.8 required=3.0 tests=RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ks215171.kimsufi.com X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at ks215171.kimsufi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201208/110 X-Sequence-Number: 39931 He wrote: "I can ssh between servers," regards, Andreas On 08/24/2012 06:57 PM, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:35:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> "No route to host" doesn't have anything to do with whether there's >> anything listening on the target port ... what's more likely is that the >> OP mistyped the IP address, or else there's something wrong with his >> network layout, interface netmask assignments, >> that sort of thing. > I don't know about VMWare, but with VirtualBox if you set up two guests > with NAT they are sharing the host's IP address as far as the outside > world is concerned. So each can see the host and the outside world, but > they can't see one another. > > > >