Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6DdQ-0004zp-Vz for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:42:41 +0000 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6DdO-0001ea-T9 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:42:40 +0000 Received: by dady13 with SMTP id y13so3026715dad.19 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:42:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-forwarded-message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ypw2GhflW8Cx+BddxarqNt9NudJvbZWBX0xDXgdrk18=; b=lVJlniXPQijUQQWXPF6ERBBbkCKRf4LM90odPpFLY7XgwZ1uFhlNiooLyNLVnDz1yD pfYHb4YlBb5wHzw8al1yYBEel3ACxRPmBXBvYJCLzwPOMnoQNPK7h1hq9l2bqaPeVjka YzlTy7umIcF3Bd2RStLZqfXB9uqSKNB/snQV+phw08jz3A0la4Zq9PTBcp46irjo5sch GW+izePOSyTD3ZM1GnTrCS2c1++MRzM7UzpTiXlDs3GnN+p4PpNxvttHxKkDwc4Kz1TS qn7PAYXhJeoDSurvem6I9Z2pS88iphlUHqYC8R4kPkuL7U4djQDJMymrnRtLtOoG10ak VdWw== Received: by 10.68.225.233 with SMTP id rn9mr39311136pbc.135.1346128957824; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([116.226.69.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vx5sm15159424pbc.43.2012.08.27.21.42.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <503C4C36.4010204@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:42:30 +0800 From: Rural Hunter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Subject: Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) References: In-Reply-To: X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201208/114 X-Sequence-Number: 39935 btw, why the mail server rejected me many times? is it marked as spam?

-------- 原始消息 --------
主题: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
日期: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:55:01 +0000
发件人: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
收件人: RuralHunter@gmail.com


Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     pgsql-admin@postgresql.org

Technical details of permanent failure: 
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 unknown address (state 13).

----- Original message -----

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=6c8hoX5Vl3yHCboxcNI156fIiguPMoLh1tgPbdomtCg=;
        b=Aedu3K7NmOHqW3YFwwQZu6YCER/DmdMt+xzf1by+41EUWLIgWrgU1QLGm7vYKM06fh
         KHXHZ3iAltO2qAzWoYSKqkN8BklyukHf67U1BhUznJLPxT60aGtBGCxW9BbBj9EtTyK5
         8Ee0ihOaX1Vce36hTE8N6qmd63TlUguscd+3ScX5djsSpbvhkpFk9wG50BfZRmJN0/dP
         zRYyS+sPmqpaO3z3ysefu9SyGnBrHafCfRDEGZ2ahSmvpXgT+OsK4zzJS0QgIoUqli2d
         JFdX1Vl12mWBptlA4N6MTzNpg4rAXVWUSyLQOn8A7y4fE9otskZvxwI4QVMUSrLbGZY/
         N1Zg==
Received: by 10.66.76.106 with SMTP id j10mr25362006paw.51.1346118900365;
        Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([116.226.69.188])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sr3sm15887340pbc.44.2012.08.27.18.54.57
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <503C24EC.3030409@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:54:52 +0800
From: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Analyze on Children Tables
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb18030; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm on pg 9.1.3. When I analyze verbose on parent table, I see all the 
children are analyzed in the log. But I found the last analyzed time of 
children tables are not changed. So my question is, after I analyzed the 
parent, should I re-analyze children tables?