Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCH5t-0005gA-6x for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:37:05 +0000 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCH5q-0004tX-KD for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:37:03 +0000 Received: by bkwj10 with SMTP id j10so842744bkw.19 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:37:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chrullrich.net; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DZJr81IA90wVl1CbWxs0mhsbXdD23eVHnSKUVPoIIII=; b=3NF9iqkPwqqrEmqLJaLWBsa3JzDavlDpyfMEa82v+BEFS4+vd+0ETfzZKW5MfeD+Kt 7pjn4LHIQpo7I9xJAl2Gfdpd8CUq42ICmv31DMusoodogjHd5n08S0iTrfboO0/NfdaG Mb2KSWicjsaDMw7BhugnQ6WehVlgh752BAhF8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=DZJr81IA90wVl1CbWxs0mhsbXdD23eVHnSKUVPoIIII=; b=mb9ctVDhBNM3Gir42liOZDtLzznLpLwQ66QVG5zhGpolbHoJ59qPvrd/5aA2Gwa+HD Vqvbe7nNM8SmnTG1DZznFcxuAm9O5jsaHOXBH2QuXXC7oK18O/h0g/ZIfmhy07XexIVl XNcoxCfjA3mRbigLaHxIq2hpvl1Y8iG/9dvpB1so4JJIkf+HYvRHGOdn6YTF7j1jXrA6 VChShKpA/UmfJU61ywDrPdRX5JC4/x7c2qE+cIP3eeL/RMchmEzl6zNboNFsjm92H1rG IFwblOTC5rSuaiYvkzwORL7Dm+ltQhsmqqa550nzNUt+RdY40Mq2egsqiinQC/CnG6YS 7J9w== Received: by 10.205.123.10 with SMTP id gi10mr353244bkc.9.1347572220344; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.23] (p5081D670.dip.t-dialin.net. [80.129.214.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g12sm2344649bkt.7.2012.09.13.14.36.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <505251F8.2080701@chrullrich.net> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:36:56 +0200 From: Christian Ullrich User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian CC: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Problem with pg_upgrade 9.2 on Windows References: <20120913143727.GA29170@momjian.us> In-Reply-To: <20120913143727.GA29170@momjian.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnnMZN3olhnbs4NFZzfdfNTIpgvI8PsC12tZ+VMBrmtqAwUMWXMbe5WscITQoaum856+7AD X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201209/76 X-Sequence-Number: 40017 * Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:15:00PM +0200, Christian Ullrich wrote: >> c:\Daten>path >> PATH=c:\windows;c:\windows\system32;c:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.2\bin >> >> c:\Daten>pg_upgrade --old-bindir="c:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.1\bin" >> --new-bindir="c:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.2\bin" >> --old-datadir="c:\Daten\db\pgsql" >> --new-datadir=c:\Daten\db\pgsql-9.2\data --old-port=5432 >> --new-port=5433 --user=postgres --verbose --check > > So I assume this is an upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2, based on the prompts, > right? 9.1.5 to 9.2.0. And, as all to usual, I find myself apologizing for wasting everyone's time after finding my problem just after asking for help. It was my fault; while I'm too embarrassed to go into the details, let's just say there was an environmental discrepancy I had caused. -- Christian