Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ULSJC-0005VV-FS for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:57:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ULSJB-0008Qz-V6 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:57:02 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ULSJB-0008Qu-9g for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:57:01 +0000 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ULSJ7-0006Kv-IU for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:57:01 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t10so128294pdi.20 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:56:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mx3Hy7loRIQi3Pkm+vdboETerB5KGCZRjISamvyEI4w=; b=wNMpVGPoc4mu+mMMsk2+i1omZsJhtPFWipeSdJqFcG4SODoLDfKpJ68O+/dZvroarw Q5A+9nSW4optHauD0bwOEUtOp/1jRGFRIgJmyjiduxB4KzHBk0qN6CLNCNRYiLVTYhNr j6er9rKIxLoY21B+/Xb7vhPMdXVUaHF4Ahb6wj9dd96meWatriD1x7bo49n1xZJ3K6P0 et+2oU5XD5hQYdl1QzmMAMPitDGd87aH9ldCmiE4h5S2jqHnsGKh4oBX42wWG5jPusR1 HWbgN9G8/cJSNBivp4dyPvtCO6Je6KgYzWqoJ9yWuNiJ84thajxeAa5NjRdHreBTUVjj iYKg== X-Received: by 10.68.231.70 with SMTP id te6mr1942873pbc.159.1364536616254; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([116.226.40.101]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id to7sm2168537pab.0.2013.03.28.22.56.53 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51552D2A.4090903@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:56:58 +0800 From: Rural Hunter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Grant tables cascade to sequence? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB18030; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org Hi, I encounter the same issue often: Granted update/insert to an user but forgot to grant it on the related sequence. It's hard to understand that an user has write access on table but not on necessary sequences. I think the grant on tables should cascade to related sequences. What do you think? -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin