Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZVyL-00036W-7o for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 00:41:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZVyK-0001E7-JC for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 00:41:36 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZVyJ-0001E2-Qm for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 00:41:35 +0000 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net ([2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:4]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZVy8-00012c-KU for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 00:41:34 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAM5MiFF20WL1/2dsb2JhbAANQ79ngmGBH4MTAQEBAwF4BgsLGAkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAKIAq8WgzOONY84FoM9A45/nQI Received: from ppp118-209-98-245.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.4]) ([118.209.98.245]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 07 May 2013 10:11:20 +0930 Message-ID: <51884DAF.1050208@internode.on.net> Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 10:41:19 +1000 From: Julian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: top posting? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org On 07/05/13 04:15, Craig James wrote: > Just out of curiousity, I see comments like this all the time: > >> (*please* stop top-posting). So people can... > I've been participating in newsgroups since UUCP days, and I've never > encountered a group before that encouraged bottom posting. Bottom > posting has traditionally been considered rude -- it forces readers to > scroll, often through pages and pages of text, to see a few lines of > original material. ...dissect... > The most efficient strategy, one that respects other members' time, is > to briefly summarize your point at the TOP of a posting, then to > *briefly* quote only the relevant parts of the post to which you are > replying, and bottom-post after the quoted text. That lets your reader > quickly see if it's relevant or not, and move on to the next post. ...and comment... > Contributors in these newsgroups seem to think it's OK to quote five > pages of someone else's response, then add one or two sentences at the > bottom ... it's just laziness that forces readers to wade through the > same stuff over and over in each thread. ..where appropriate and... > How did the Postgres newsgroups get started with this "only bottom post" > idea? ---------------SNIP--------------- ...*snip* where appropriate. I actually prefer it as it linear in reference to time. I top post for FWD. Regards, Jules. -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin