Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V8u7M-0005gq-CF for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:33:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V8u7L-0002u0-Rk for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:33:11 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V8u7L-0002tr-12 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:33:11 +0000 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com ([69.168.55.30]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V8u7F-0005HO-QZ for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:33:09 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (spinlock.commandprompt.com [69.168.55.30]) by lists.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D28702E6; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([71.95.98.238] helo=[192.168.1.5]) by assp.commandprompt.com with ESMTPS(AES256-SHA) (2.1.1); 12 Aug 2013 08:33:02 -0700 Message-ID: <52090030.4000503@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:33:04 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David F. Skoll" CC: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Opinions on SSDs References: <20130812112833.65a97285@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com> In-Reply-To: <20130812112833.65a97285@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Assp-Version: 2.1.1(11364) on assp.commandprompt.com X-Assp-Client-SSL: yes X-Assp-ID: assp.commandprompt.com m1-21582-09922 X-Assp-Envelope-From: jd@commandprompt.com X-Assp-Intended-For: dfs@roaringpenguin.com X-Assp-Original-Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Opinions on SSDs X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org On 08/12/2013 08:28 AM, David F. Skoll wrote: > > Hi, > > We run a fairly write-intensive workload and are looking at upgrading > our Pg servers. (PostgreSQL 9.1; no practical way to upgrade to 9.2 for > a while because we use what's packaged with Debian.) apt.postgresql.org > > I'm considering the following configuration: > > Dual 4-core Intel CPU (E5620 at 2.4GHz) > > 192GB of RAM > > Sixteen 240GB Intel SSD 520 series drives arranged using Linux > RAID-10. The RAID 10 array will use eight mirrored stripes using the > "offset-copies" RAID10 scheme. > > Questions: > > 1) Has anyone had experience with Intel 520 SSDs? Are they reliable? > When they fail, do they fail nicely (ie, failure detected and bad drive > removed from RAID array) or horribly (data silently corrupted...) ? I don't recall if the 520s have powerloss protection but you will want to check that. > > 2) Is this RAID arrangement sensible? I've seen reports where some > people keep the pg_xlog directory on a separate RAID array, but I > don't really see the advantage with SSDs. Put the pg_xlog on spindles, they are more than fast enough and won't eat up the write life of your SSDs. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc For my dreams of your image that blossoms a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin