pg.ddx.io pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedsum, min, max and null
3+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* sum, min, max and null
@ 2014-08-18 18:21 Nagy László Zsolt <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nagy László Zsolt @ 2014-08-18 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-admin
Hi,
I understand that sum, min and max ignore null values. So for example
this query:
select sum(v),min(v) from (
select 1 as v
union all select null
union all select 3
) s
will result in sum(v)=4 , min(v)=1.
However, I'm in need of a different interpretation, where sum() should
change the output value to null if there is any NULL value in the input.
How do I achieve this? I was experimenting with this:
select case when sum(hasnull)>0 then null else sum(v) end as mysum from (
select v, case when v is null then 1 else 0 end as hasnull
from (
select 1 as v
union all select null
union all select 3
) s ) s2
It works but this is so ugly that I'm not even trying to use it in
production code. Is there any better way to do it?
Thanks,
Laszlo
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: sum, min, max and null
@ 2014-08-18 19:06 David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
parent: Nagy László Zsolt <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David G Johnston @ 2014-08-18 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-admin
Laszlo Nagy wrote
> Hi,
>
> I understand that sum, min and max ignore null values. So for example
> this query:
>
> select sum(v),min(v) from (
> select 1 as v
> union all select null
> union all select 3
> ) s
>
> will result in sum(v)=4 , min(v)=1.
>
> However, I'm in need of a different interpretation, where sum() should
> change the output value to null if there is any NULL value in the input.
> How do I achieve this? I was experimenting with this:
>
>
> select case when sum(hasnull)>0 then null else sum(v) end as mysum from (
> select v, case when v is null then 1 else 0 end as hasnull
> from (
> select 1 as v
> union all select null
> union all select 3
> ) s ) s2
>
> It works but this is so ugly that I'm not even trying to use it in
> production code. Is there any better way to do it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Laszlo
I believe you will have to write a custom
CREATE FUNCTION
and
CREATE AGGREGATE
where the relevant state transitions functions become NULL as soon as one
the incoming input is null. The problem for min/max will be distinguishing
between the original null and a null as a result of a prior null input. You
might be forced to use min/max integer for the staring value instead and
error if an input happen to be the same.
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/sum-min-max-and-null-tp5815288p5815291.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: sum, min, max and null
@ 2014-08-18 19:13 Matheus de Oliveira <matioli.matheus@gmail.com>
parent: Nagy László Zsolt <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matheus de Oliveira @ 2014-08-18 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nagy László Zsolt <gandalf@shopzeus.com>; +Cc: pgsql-admin
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Nagy László Zsolt <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
wrote:
> However, I'm in need of a different interpretation, where sum() should
> change the output value to null if there is any NULL value in the input.
> How do I achieve this? I was experimenting with this:
>
>
> select case when sum(hasnull)>0 then null else sum(v) end as mysum from (
> select v, case when v is null then 1 else 0 end as hasnull
> from (
> select 1 as v
> union all select null
> union all select 3
> ) s ) s2
>
One approach is simple using "count(*)" that does take NULL into account:
SELECT CASE WHEN count(v)=count(*) THEN sum(v) END AS mysum ...
Perhaps it would be better in terms of performance to check for NULLs first.
Regards,
--
Matheus de Oliveira
Analista de Banco de Dados
Dextra Sistemas - MPS.Br nível F!
www.dextra.com.br/postgres
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-18 19:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-18 18:21 sum, min, max and null Nagy László Zsolt <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
2014-08-18 19:06 ` David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
2014-08-18 19:13 ` Matheus de Oliveira <matioli.matheus@gmail.com>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox