Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVjIf-0008Pm-St for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:16:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVjIe-0002DP-Lp for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:16:00 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVjIY-000232-Gy for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:15:54 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVjIT-0005j0-V5 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:15:52 +0000 Received: by igkb16 with SMTP id b16so13582300igk.1 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:15:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sN7Ohw5aMaOIDiIfZ3Ny1M2JXKDyFxXlBtsJmNCgLXI=; b=HbqnkXBNSY8vn0qXjfbn0ykOIqKP3j8a8BhdwNeZ2tmuD/sAEb/eiOdlsF4E/athG3 NMMiEWvxyxCxsHqpSEVWTkWVX2fk/BJIophTREcnpQnlFY4gSYUnN0GtixyvvZxzuFR6 AAOQbEuPsXZpYF2pzi6YSol9Jc6MzYs5tni17e0UXvRGMJM9DyalATW5ixBw6Z35Afzg v7L56se18xgYO5UzT4tcZFB/ydKJJmpkm+go+wZ4wOk4fFftNPw/Z+55Ewujoz8PEUyM Z35gQU1+8/W0pfwmp9jOHZiP/DlTvw0NwUXQnBoFFp8ANY060Y2/PxUDaB6DyqX21iVb YKrg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQluSMsFUqPJJWIEWLgY12AdvlR/cYLlDos8bgYAZuXiE+kMJYjr21LY8jrsO5vyVIu2Szbh X-Received: by 10.107.47.216 with SMTP id v85mr65442452iov.86.1426090547362; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.21] ([50.243.150.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g74sm2677555ioi.42.2015.03.11.09.15.45 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55006A30.8090600@consistentstate.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:15:44 -0600 From: CS DBA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'pgsql-admin@postgresql.org'" Subject: Downgrade from 9.2.10 to 9.2.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org All; We have a client that rolled out several changes including an upgrade (via the PGDG repos i.e: yum.postgresql.org) from 9.2.6 to 9.2.10 Nw we are seeing major locking issues, it comes in spikes and we see hundreds of locks, and thousands of waiting queries when the spikes occur. I have a hunch their issue is the in house software they upgraded but the client thinks it's the postgres upgrade. Question: how do we safely roll back to 9.2.6? Can I use "yum downgrade"? i.e.: yum downgrade postgresql92-server-9.2.6-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 postgresql92-9.2.6-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 postgresql92-contrib-9.2.6-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 I assume the above approach requires the 9.2.6 packages to still be available at yum.postgresql.org? Is this so? Is there a better method? Thanks in advance -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin