Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWNxI-0004vf-K3 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:40:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWNxG-0004jN-Jr for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:40:38 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWNxF-0004jG-Gg for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:40:37 +0000 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com ([69.168.55.30]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YWNxB-0001Tm-HJ for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:40:34 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (c-67-168-169-165.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.168.169.165]) by lists.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1C662348; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 04:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5502CCAF.4030606@commandprompt.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 04:40:31 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Achilleas Mantzios , pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Samsung SSD 850 PRO 1T : any good for PostgreSQL? References: <5502C98F.2090806@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <5502C98F.2090806@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org On 03/13/2015 04:27 AM, Achilleas Mantzios wrote: > > Hello, > > we maintain a DB of nearly 500GB of data (and always getting larger), > and we are currently thinking of moving to SSD. > I have read Greg Smith's book on PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance and his > considerations on SSD and the way that write back works. > > This particular model (Samsung SSD 850 PRO 1T) does not employ any > special circuitry, battery or capacitor > to enforce that the data are really flushed to the medium. > > What is your take on this? Is it dangerous to have PgSQL on this disk > especially in cases of power outages? (we have full UPS support, however > nothing can be overlooked, anything can happen) If it does not have power loss protection, don't use it. JD -- The most kicking donkey PostgreSQL Infrastructure company in existence. The oldest, the most experienced, the consulting company to the stars. Command Prompt, Inc. http://www.commandprompt.com/ +1 -503-667-4564 - 24x7 - 365 - Proactive and Managed Professional Services! -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin