Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYHVG-0005Tz-Ef for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:11:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYHVF-0000r1-8c for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:11:33 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYHVE-0000qu-2q for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:11:32 +0000 Received: from mail-yh0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c01::233]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYHVA-0005KG-BJ for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:11:30 +0000 Received: by yhpt93 with SMTP id t93so17233751yhp.0 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:11:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wfAg0xdoSUIGpb9QiFJz6C7jZVoNC+Fo5UbkjbCQbf0=; b=wm7oVzEbCf4QkQg7j9H3VrZXj9nUHODpgkLT8ZNw+Yn/JQErCMpDzH0OWIaLNv3MYq XvtcX0EW0YDwMMOcwuVvw1vphE90SN6EXEn9u6AMYIWrgIknNpuQrf08Z1acWQoAPh9/ QIVfr1zHGkKbV+oqlSNqcAo6ApQugskhqLBxVbdPIDdCHe6/TFkK0iQ07876HDVJDlsk hP6URDZc2Ik1ykWeGkQSNsrDQI+hHOdl5EXDCjrodYoKcdtrSSZdJGuQrgp3zefxAuyD XsLQcwau0vB+PJyZtdbcyM297ihlCvSQB2JvpHIPVGGm6SCvzoR+YQaUOOJkDiSmmFD3 2n1g== X-Received: by 10.170.135.70 with SMTP id b67mr56659503ykc.56.1426698687223; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.254.2] (h77.89.102.166.static.ip.windstream.net. [166.102.89.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm15007203yhx.14.2015.03.18.10.11.26 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5509B1BB.4000306@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:11:23 -0400 From: John Scalia User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website References: <5509A2A2.90305@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org On 3/18/2015 12:48 PM, Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de wrote: > John Scalia wrote on Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:07 PM: >> Or is some major flaw with 9.3.3 that should motivate us to get off it immediately? > Consider this: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1328517318.859752.1424472489522.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com > "Oh, and please update to 9.3.6; there are some nasty bugs fixed." Yikes, I see what you mean, even though we haven't experienced any issues with 9.3.3. You should all know that I personally have no problem upgrading at all and I've even put 9.4.0 into a sandbox just to satisfy my own curiosity. The problem here is more political, including the fact that Verizon is trying to migrate off of postgresql. I'm reasonably certain if I say to migrate to a newer version, the suggestion will get canned, and the order come down to start using NuoDB instead. -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin