Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buOtD-0001qj-Uz for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:08:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buOtD-0005vY-Hi for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:08:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buOtC-0005tf-Qd for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:08:30 +0000 Received: from imx6.etecsa.cu ([200.55.152.141]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buOt9-00066z-Re for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:08:29 +0000 Received: from nodo1.etecsa.cu (unknown [192.168.91.200]) by imx6.etecsa.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87383CE; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:08:20 -0400 (CDT) Received: from webmail.etecsa.cu (unknown [192.168.91.6]) by nodo1.etecsa.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8EB3018D98; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:08:20 -0400 (CDT) Received: from 192.168.207.54 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gilberto.castillo) by webmail.etecsa.cu with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:07:58 -0500 (GMT+5) Message-ID: <55198.192.168.207.54.1476302878.squirrel@webmail.etecsa.cu> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:07:58 -0500 (GMT+5) Subject: Re: [MASSMAIL] Is Bi-Directional Replication (BDR) is fully integrated into PostgreSQL 9.6 or 9.7? From: "Gilberto Castillo" To: "Ravi Tammineni" Cc: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Reply-To: gilberto.castillo@etecsa.cu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5_4.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Lua-Profiles: 104217 [Oct 12 2016] X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Version: 5.6.0.28 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Envelope-From: gilberto.castillo@etecsa.cu X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Rate: 0 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not_detected X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Info: LuaCore: 126 126 e1a2ef632325e7d14b9c14e65036ac8e4571b920, {msgid_created_by_recepient}, Auth:dkim=none X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, 2016/10/11 11:52:21 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.1.721, bases: 2016/10/12 13:33:00 #7977220 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org > Hi, > > We are planning to setup BDR (from 2ndQuadrant) for one of our critical > production environment. Anyone has any idea what is the support from > Postgres going forward? Will it be fully integrated into PostgreSQL 9.7? > Last year someone mentioned that it will be integrated in 9.6 but seems > like it never happened. > > Currently we are using Postgres 9.4 version binaries from 2ndQuadrant. But > our development wants to upgrade the database to 9.6/9.7 based on BDR > availability. DBR only in 9.4 > Thanks > ravi > -- Saludos, Gilberto Castillo ETECSA, La Habana, Cuba -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin