Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751D5636A21
	for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  2 Mar 2009 11:29:59 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 64827-05-2
	for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  2 Mar 2009 11:29:55 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A356402CA
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Mon,  2 Mar 2009 11:08:04 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n22F7vlu005522;
	Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:07:57 -0500 (EST)
To: Ashish Karalkar <ashishka@synechron.com>
cc: Jan-Peter Seifert <Jan-Peter.Seifert@gmx.de>, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: getting 'full' names of functions? 
In-reply-to: <49ABE46D.3000501@synechron.com> 
References: <20090302122020.137490@gmx.net> <49ABE46D.3000501@synechron.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Ashish Karalkar <ashishka@synechron.com>
	message dated "Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:21:41 +0530"
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:07:57 -0500
Message-ID: <5521.1236006477@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200903/16
X-Sequence-Number: 31516

Ashish Karalkar <ashishka@synechron.com> writes:
> Jan-Peter Seifert wrote:
>> Obviously you can't just use the specific_name from information_schema.routine_privileges for this.

> May be this will help you:

Easier is just
	select oid::regprocedure from pg_proc where <whatever>

			regards, tom lane