Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vx3z1-00DJPP-1h for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 14:10:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vx3xz-0017cy-2v for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 14:09:48 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vx3xz-0017cn-1o for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 14:09:48 +0000 Received: from [89.231.102.37] (helo=mail.localities.work) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vx3xx-000000001e3-3R3u for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 14:09:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by swir.mine.priv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20188C01408B; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:09:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=localities.work; h=in-reply-to:from:from:content-language:references:subject :subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=dkim20251117; t= 1772460584; x=1773324585; bh=CDpp1vjasjBVrY67u4s1XWW0ov85Mbm0arm 8MZ6qugo=; b=Z6cOj0/wyvBaX06ViLRNtiychC65+DuYuHJFVPjPjexOx1ip7rH +oYWYMfVcpwuDIOerhXLZ5uohLPYGPk6f+JhvTOuBPp7XwolSn6WUIrcvNj+v2df 8aTwees4C3tEYlNrJuv3mdJvKCT6uVVTuASXgOBPW5Rm0IT+DXjmxaQg= X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mine.priv Received: from swir.mine.priv ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (swir.mine.priv [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10022) with LMTP id MBmSbkwpD38R; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 15:09:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.3.0.10] (unknown [10.3.0.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by swir.mine.priv (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D6FDC014085; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:09:44 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------ymtRGEiwrY07bYij8fuM0kEl" Message-ID: <58477698-42df-4e66-aa6b-f86c794919d5@localities.work> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 15:09:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: upgrade from 13 to 16 To: Ron Johnson , Pgsql-admin References: <7e69fa35-05c7-4cd9-9eba-90fd78b7cd18@localities.work> <0bdbf1e5-e8ab-408d-8e0e-f4e3df6a3c1d@localities.work> Content-Language: en-MW, pl, pl-PL From: listy In-Reply-To: X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 89.231.102.37 (failed) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------ymtRGEiwrY07bYij8fuM0kEl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cannot say about Debian but RHEL family (perhaps exceptions exist) do not, certainly not on Centos, Ubuntu which I use, yes. But also rhel/centos do not do major PGsql rel. upgrade within the same/one OS release, I do not think so. What happened to me - what I did rather - was upgrade from c9 to c10. (not officially supported.) --------------ymtRGEiwrY07bYij8fuM0kEl Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cannot say about Debian but RHEL family (perhaps exceptions exist) do not, certainly not on Centos, Ubuntu which I use, yes.
But also rhel/centos do not do major PGsql rel. upgrade within the same/one OS release, I do not think so.
What happened to me - what I did rather - was upgrade from c9 to c10. (not officially supported.)
--------------ymtRGEiwrY07bYij8fuM0kEl--