Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPtNe-00067K-VJ for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:30:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPtNe-0001oe-DP for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:30:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPtNd-0001oJ-Qx for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:30:21 +0000 Received: from nrccenhts1.nrc.ca ([132.246.15.88]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dPtNa-0005mJ-Dk for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:30:20 +0000 Received: from [132.246.194.15] (132.246.11.2) by nrccenhts1.nrc.ca (132.246.15.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.348.2; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:30:13 -0400 Message-ID: <595287EF.5060904@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:29:35 -0700 From: ghiureai User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Subject: PG container technologies which one ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org Hi List, I am not familiar with container technologies , we are thinking about choosing one of them : either LXC or Docker for some of our new PG database ( the expected database size avg 130-150GB, mostly OLAP transactions with data ingestion running on regular interval, the Pg mem size will match the db size ) , the dev team is pushing for container db instead of physical db, I am not convince will bring us significant advantages, from my own brief research I see there are more examples and support technical documentation about docker and Pg than lxc , Also some of people in our team mentioned : -with Pg + docker container you do not have the option to log direct in container, monitor performance of database ( like running pgcenter) and -can not have a crontab installed inside container to run some basic database maintenance jobs ? Are this assumption valid ? Was mentioned that : Lxc is more close to a VM and a DBA has more flexibility to perform the regular tasks. Please , I am looking for your feedback and comments from your own experience running Pg in container. Thank you , Isabella -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin