Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gk1Vf-0001lg-Cd for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:50:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gk1Ve-0000uf-1q for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:50:38 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gk1Vd-0000tO-N9 for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:50:37 +0000 Received: from mail.thelabyrinth.net ([45.56.70.56]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gk1Vb-0006N1-6R for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:50:36 +0000 Received: from Davids-MacBook.local (156-155-5-216.ip.internet.co.za [156.155.5.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dsteele) by mail.thelabyrinth.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBDBA5466B; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: pgBackRest : "ERROR: [042]: unexpected EOF reading line from remote process on" and stale pgbackrest processes hanging To: Stephen Frost , Achilleas Mantzios Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org References: <20190116202758.GG2528@tamriel.snowman.net> From: David Steele Message-ID: <5dca01e0-0cd9-2064-571f-473e97b82087@pgmasters.net> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:50:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190116202758.GG2528@tamriel.snowman.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 1/16/19 10:27 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Achilleas Mantzios (achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) wrote: >> >> Is this behavior normal ? Would the 4 processes be killed due to KEEPALIVE settings eventually ? > > Yes, they almost certainly would have timed out eventually- but how > long were you already waiting..? The timeouts in pgbackrest are not > terribly long, in general. By default the remote processes will shutdown after 30 minutes if they have not gotten a message from the main process. This is controlled by the `protocol-timeout` option. It's a bit unusual for them to get stuck like this -- usually they get an eof and exit immediately. Definitely looks like something was up with SSH. Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net