Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g16GXRE81435 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:33:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g16GXUf06702; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:33:30 -0500 (EST) To: s.chava@wcom.com (Srinivasa Rao Chava) cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pg_restore In-reply-to: <66d229f1.0202060747.39b66049@posting.google.com> References: <66d229f1.0202060747.39b66049@posting.google.com> Comments: In-reply-to s.chava@wcom.com (Srinivasa Rao Chava) message dated "06 Feb 2002 07:47:38 -0800" Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 11:33:30 -0500 Message-ID: <6699.1013013210@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200202/44 X-Sequence-Number: 3205 s.chava@wcom.com (Srinivasa Rao Chava) writes: > Archiver(db): Could not execute query. Code = 7. Explanation from > backend: 'ERROR: mysequence.setval: you don't have permissions to set > sequence mysequence Hmm, I think I see an oversight in pg_dump. Exactly what options did you give to pg_dump and pg_restore? regards, tom lane