Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWvi-00080k-0G for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:23:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWvf-0005BE-Ly for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:23:35 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWvf-00057n-6j for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:23:35 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::242]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWvY-0001OS-MN for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:23:34 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-x242.google.com with SMTP id y23so9389596oia.4 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:23:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=iu+Upff5ou0q0mEdACGAexrkatZxEyPIwdZZKwspxUY=; b=IqTEWDaEiYw41yYlBgvwuuMP25uQzYCO3nfcL8f4yQhAjVwHCzTEj7s5GWK6VqQPBm 6+NYWLocORdC1CfXqz1dSgT57m+SMyu2RInuZWdoPJvYhuGuaJ67NRtKpoQftZoFm3Nl TPLCJR1hg5jjvM8FWQabsMNqq1yA10bekqraZs8dgVOQ3j/+BjqloZFRHHwU5tYPZKki +8eNttIqjApRzVTIjvZZl16jE2nXCrD5XCtIkmYLEQjWKSbXJsOwhu33Y6c1IKmHeXzw XT5t+T2+yxebYPFUyHrg1QzGIL3aXGQ0cJNydUaaUCO8T+7RPDYNNwq28W8rEx9IwtIc deJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=iu+Upff5ou0q0mEdACGAexrkatZxEyPIwdZZKwspxUY=; b=dbtC9GJBmgrpBTQN7m/K1fbjncMLliRmKPGI9G3wUtElus7v63FLRsP5KgLWi+xSU4 M5VhI5MCGqehYa8YnpZx5TJFnS0l9M+wAMSV3SM+KJVAP0NCZ/bymVg5TP+fly8Tswfa H2tjogUsfDrIx70264wxPWVdrr0mq2TwjZHf87JV9RkiBTyPV6jbVEmKD+RMPQdCQXJ4 cIIZhjeIvofx+z82pThAaB/Ncjs+/qmhMojWn6qXTTKCZh2wZfrKhqAeIT2r0bWGTp/m X63Xs+ahGbz0QAF5AfUUbs2EpY7aE7AcQNudc8auSYQqkIvM5e/uzMWsSBpa2lm3pQVV lrcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdrbkJAnKlE/ARrYOxWFAEJUp6OwWAYHUgC6I5ZqW/v59F8NtcO c8sFA8cNb8ldB6sxd1AM56CWVcV5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5ZtEjLuctxn7srF0ItUK+MbJDlpCukvNNFEgioyQfAyzVbtSPWBDpL1+3kpQozeBPz5g5n7A== X-Received: by 2002:aca:32d4:: with SMTP id y203mr120312oiy.151.1547828607425; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:23:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (ip70-171-116-89.no.no.cox.net. [70.171.116.89]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v141sm2237949oia.25.2019.01.18.08.23.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:23:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: upgrade from FC9 / PG8.3 to C7 / PG 9.6 - utf8 To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org References: <201901181429.51278.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> <201901181508.26233.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> <8c6bfd45-8aa5-b966-ce29-ac65b7b525b3@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <201901181530.42190.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> From: Ron Message-ID: <6ea28c2f-9916-1f74-9262-9448e12c62a9@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:23:25 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201901181530.42190.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 1/18/19 9:30 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: [snip] > I have done the import using the pg_dumpall done on the 8.3 system. From the > comments earlier, would I be better off doing a pg_dumpall of the 8.3 system > using the binarys from the 10.6 system? How much data do you have, and how large of a window do you have to migrate the data? For example, we moved from 8.4 to 9.6 (that was frozen while 10 was still in beta) and it would have taken almost five days to dump the data using the single-threaded 8.4 pg_dump, and just as long to do a single-threaded restore. OTOH, the elapsed time using the 9.6 pg_dump with 8 threads was 14 hours, and the restore only 8.33 hours. -- Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.