Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1flidD-0005kq-Ny for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 22:33:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1flidB-0004qw-Pb for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 22:33:09 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1flidB-0004qp-G3 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 22:33:09 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1flid7-0003YD-Pq for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 22:33:08 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w73MWvGH007665; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 18:32:57 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Dean Rasheed cc: Andres Freund , Amit Langote , Mario De Frutos Dieguez , pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Problem with a "complex" upsert In-reply-to: References: <18795.1529600753@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8da3739d-da24-1125-cab6-b68d6ec1bc6a@lab.ntt.co.jp> <30415.1531256373@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4b956567-8283-1b8a-7cd7-f8b6e626bba9@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20180803184638.gdii7mja7qfc3fba@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Dean Rasheed message dated "Fri, 03 Aug 2018 22:26:11 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7663.1533335577.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 18:32:57 -0400 Message-ID: <7664.1533335577@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Dean Rasheed writes: > On 3 August 2018 at 19:46, Andres Freund wrote: >> Are you planning to push a version of this soon? It'd be good to >> get this included in the next set of releases... > Yes, agreed. I'll try to do it this weekend. Keep in mind that we are hard up against the release deadline. This is a bad weekend to be pushing anything you are not 100.00% sure of; the later, the more so, as by Sunday you will probably not get a complete set of buildfarm reports before the wrap happens. Balance the risks of shipping a broken release vs. waiting one more quarter to ship the fix. After a quick look at the size of the patch, my own inclination if I were the committer would be to wait till after the releases are out. Or you might consider pushing only to 11+HEAD, with the expectation of back-patching later after we've gotten some beta results. regards, tom lane