Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D871337B94 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:39:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63744-08 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:39:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58C51337B92 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:39:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 76Wl1g0081YDfWL5D6fWmU; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:39:30 +0000 Received: from sz0093.wc.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.58.151]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 76fU1g00A3FmDic3g6fU8E; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:39:30 +0000 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:39:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Lou Picciano To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org, mark Message-ID: <767282134.451286.1297535968024.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <1165290323.451246.1297535901031.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> Subject: Re: PG 9 OpenLDAP 2.4 dependency ? (in a jam) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_451285_1806374939.1297535968023" X-Originating-IP: [68.39.28.87] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.5_GA_2431.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Mac)/6.0.5_GA_2427.RHEL4) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.907 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RFC_ABUSE_POST=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201102/95 X-Sequence-Number: 36734 ------=_Part_451285_1806374939.1297535968023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hard to know without a lot more info - ...any number of things could be culprit - from 'simple' config issue right up through schema definition. Lou ----- Original Message ----- From: "mark" To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 6:12:10 PM Subject: [ADMIN] PG 9 OpenLDAP 2.4 dependency ? (in a jam) Is this true ? I am having trouble finding the documentation on this. Thanks for someone with better google-foo than me if they can find it, and maybe why? I have an LDAP master running 2.3.(something) on a box and it is looking like getting that to 2.4 is a no-go. Postgres does not auth with that LDAP instance. Thanks Mark -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin ------=_Part_451285_1806374939.1297535968023 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <= div style=3D'font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Hard to= know without a lot more info - 

...any number of t= hings could be culprit - from 'simple' config issue right up through schema= definition.

Lou 

----- Origina= l Message -----
From: "mark" <mark@sm-a.net>
To: pgsql-admin@po= stgresql.org
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 6:12:10 PM
Subject: [ADM= IN] PG 9 OpenLDAP 2.4 dependency  ? (in a jam)

Is this true ? &= nbsp;I am having trouble finding the documentation on this.

Thanks f= or someone with better google-foo than me if they can find it, and
maybe= why?

I have an LDAP master running 2.3.(something) on a box and it = is looking
like getting that to 2.4 is a no-go.

Postgres does no= t auth with that LDAP instance.


Thanks

Mark


= --
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To= make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/p= gsql-admin
------=_Part_451285_1806374939.1297535968023--