Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vBb9c-0019PG-MS for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:53:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vBb9b-00021W-3o for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:53:34 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vBb9a-00021B-OX for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:53:33 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vBb9X-003dkd-1p for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:53:33 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 59MFrDZQ795519; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:53:13 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera cc: Ishan Arunkumar Joshi , "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: does BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10 In-reply-to: <202510221536.dyytpdtwyf7z@alvherre.pgsql> References: <202510221536.dyytpdtwyf7z@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera message dated "Wed, 22 Oct 2025 18:38:07 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <795517.1761148393.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:53:13 -0400 Message-ID: <795518.1761148393@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera writes: > On 2025-Oct-22, Tom Lane wrote: >> Our release notes don't usually mention bug numbers. > Maybe we should add that. I don't think so, because as often as not there is no bug number. regards, tom lane