Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8AB133616B for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:26:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94680-03-3 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAB21337B96 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:25:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0QLPvi0009015 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:25:57 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p0QL84DV065680 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:08:04 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from news) From: Chris Browne X-Newsgroups: pgsql.admin Subject: Re: Postgres on Windows Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:46:57 -0500 Organization: cbbrowne Computing Inc Lines: 49 Message-ID: <87ipxbo0ji.fsf@cbbrowne.afilias-int.info> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TC8zgs98cR6DPiNZH6NHrEabMUY= To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201101/163 X-Sequence-Number: 36603 ammar.fallaha@automata4.com ("Ammar Fallaha") writes: > Anyone knows of a group to support Postgres on Windows? > > Obviously your group main concern is Postgres on Linux/UNIX. > > Searching on the internet is not resolving anything SPECIDIC to > Postgres for Windows. It's quite possible that most people happen to be running Postgres on some flavour of Unix. For a long time, that was the only option, so for long time users, that has been pretty exclusively true. But many of the issues are the same, regardless of platform, and so are entirely appropriate to come here, whether relating to Windows or otherwise. If we added "pgsql.admin.windows" and "pgsql.admin.unix" lists, this would likely worsen things because: - Issues not relating to platform would fit on pgsql.admin, and so users of Windows would need to subscribe to both pgsql.admin and pgsql.admin.windows - Similarly, Unix folk would be subscribing to pgsql.admin and pgsql.admin.unix - Sometimes people would get confused, or be uncertain where the problem lies, and post Unix or Windows issues on pgsql.admin, making this list look much like it is today Add in extra not-much-worthwhile fodder such as: - People cross posting in multiple places, to make sure they're covered - People flaming one another because "that should have been posted on the other list!!!" and you've got a bunch more traffic, without there being any additional actual information. I can pretty readily ignore posts about Windows-related issues on pgsql.admin that don't apply to me; that seems a better thing than trying to add a deeper layering of lists that is likely to be counterproductive. -- "cbbrowne","@","linuxfinances.info" http://linuxfinances.info/info/multiplexor.html "Tooltips are the proof that icons don't work." -- Stefaan A. Eeckels