Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vNbbI-008FPB-36 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:47:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vNbbG-0036Xk-1V for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:47:46 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vNbbG-0036Wt-0O for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:47:46 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vNbbE-001FY0-0L for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 18:47:45 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5AOIlhMG982230; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 13:47:43 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Ron Johnson cc: Pgsql-admin Subject: Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant? In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Ron Johnson message dated "Mon, 24 Nov 2025 13:31:47 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <982228.1764010063.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 13:47:43 -0500 Message-ID: <982229.1764010063@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Ron Johnson writes: > "Option exists, is mentioned in --help, but doesn't do anything" is a (very > low priority) bug. That's plain and simple. Plain, simple, and wrong. It does do something. Maybe not something you care about, but that could be said of a lot of options. regards, tom lane