Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: building 9.6.1 with a different value for krb-srvnam
From: John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19200.1485897503@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:06:36 -0500
Cc: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AE8ABFAE-8EF1-42AA-A972-63703F78C91D@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CABzCKRDiCF1KLq0X33pCBLXJhcSrQfx5NotDe3-bXt_ABNsoog@mail.gmail.com>
 <19200.1485897503@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org

Reasonably so. I always specify the path for my operations and do not rely =
on PATH environment variables, but I did not specify where pg_config should=
 look. Does pg_config support the usual -D setting like other pqlib based c=
ommands?

Sent from my iPad

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 4:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>=20
> John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com> writes:
>> Quick question. I just built a new edition of 9.6.1 using
>> --with-krb-srvnam=3DPOSTGRES in my configure line. Everything seemed to =
build
>> properly, however, after installation, I ran pg_config and the line for
>> CONFIGURE shows every option I used except --with-krb-srvnam, So, I'm
>> wondering if the new setting actually made it in there, i.e., it did not,
>> or I just found a bug in pg_config.
>=20
> Hm, worksforme.  Are you sure you're checking the right copy of pg_config?
>=20
>            regards, tom lane


--=20
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin