public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Raj <[email protected]>
To: Pgsql-admin <[email protected]>
Subject: TPS in direct Postgres Vs TPS in pgbouncer
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 18:54:37 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJk5AtYBpy2ROKzv+se+LXpM4PZdzifnY_rZvamjHpBELxYUog@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi All,
When the application team is using posytgres directly for 17.9 version,
they get necessary TPS.
When they use pgbouncer, they get 50% reduction in TPS.
What are general advices?
My set up is 3 node PATRONI, where node3 is DR and manual failover.
Two nodes (node1 and node2) are in site A ..having haproxy, pgnouncer is
bound with haproxy.
view thread (3+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: TPS in direct Postgres Vs TPS in pgbouncer
In-Reply-To: <CAJk5AtYBpy2ROKzv+se+LXpM4PZdzifnY_rZvamjHpBELxYUog@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox