public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Raj <[email protected]>
To: Pgsql-admin <[email protected]>
Subject: OS upgrade vs Postgresql
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 15:14:49 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJk5AtaqrHfzQ8iwdg0y3qvABfSn+HCr47O-Tj8pjtTKd3sTZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi team,
Our set up is Site1(primary - rhel 9.6, postgres 17.6 in a patroni set up+
pgbackrest 2.6v & sync replica - - rhel 9.6, postgres 17.6 in a patroni
set up+ pgbackrest 2.6v) and in site2(async standby - - rhel 9.6, postgres
17.6 in a patroni set up+ pgbackrest 2.6v)
We have OS upgrade from rhel 9.6 to 9.7 for two nodes in Site1. We can see
postgres and pgbackrest has automatically upgraded to 17.7 and 2.57
respectively.
Whereas db node in site3 is no upgraded and stays with 9.6, 17.6 and 2.56
for rhel , postgres and pgbackrest version respectively.this will be
upgraded tomorrow
Is this a problem( we intend to upgrade only OS and not postgres) ? Is this
problem or is it best way or is it a normal behaviour that can or should be
avoided?
What wrong we are doing?
What is the right approach?
Any blogs is appreciated
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: OS upgrade vs Postgresql
In-Reply-To: <CAJk5AtaqrHfzQ8iwdg0y3qvABfSn+HCr47O-Tj8pjtTKd3sTZA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox