MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAK_Ha4yABYGEGAMzfNJaxeepeQNFRTFaqYRsns3GCPFeQWEWhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <6cb32d43-75d1-b896-5267-48d75c536808@sqlexec.com>
 <CANbhV-G7piJpocze7Hu+NEUb5omzc59PxgyYmX0PSwsSZznvrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <0ED6B91F-C228-404F-A4F2-B9532E205B2D@jakobs.com>
In-Reply-To: <0ED6B91F-C228-404F-A4F2-B9532E205B2D@jakobs.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:11:20 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CANbhV-EgEMD9QNFa+FS33CeMvbLr+xXMQ4J5civoOfntFq6mLg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re:
To: Holger Jakobs <holger@jakobs.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org, MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com>,
	Firthouse banu <penguinsfairy@gmail.com>,
 pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANbhV-EgEMD9QNFa%2BFS33CeMvbLr%2BxXMQ4J5civoOfntFq6mLg%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 17:08, Holger Jakobs <holger@jakobs.com> wrote:
>
> Am 24. November 2021 18:06:45 MEZ schrieb Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>:
> >On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 14:03, MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> You do understand that multi-master replication is not acid-compliant
> >> and the implications of that, right? It only works well for "read
> >> globally, write locally" scenarios.
> >
> >This isn't true.
> >
> >Async multi-master has performance advantages, but some drawbacks. But
> >systems such as BDR3 allow multiple modes of operation that overcome
> >these perceived issues.
> >
>
> Are you aware that the original poster asked for open source solutions?

Yes, I read that, which is why I didn't reply to the OP.

My response was to the statement about "multi-master replication".

> Of course, BDR3 is a great tool.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/