Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vM8GW-001kxl-0W for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:16:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vM8GU-0031nN-2c for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:16:15 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vM8GU-0031nF-1Q for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:16:14 +0000 Received: from mail-oa1-x2f.google.com ([2001:4860:4864:20::2f]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vM8GS-000aGu-2H for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:16:14 +0000 Received: by mail-oa1-x2f.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-3e89d226c3aso613220fac.2 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:16:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1763658970; x=1764263770; darn=postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DQCAZWoLamFDdu3fmKZ+XLcJj7es9nLbSERdIXdM9GI=; b=H3p443k8Pun7duImOBALmny8aW2Y7NOeE+IBQCqmMzktxUsRhVYM/tySrwTWLrXlnj rIwR0OmwOmFEkrzZR+x4kRC6kcT988K0KGRKle4sEQWMz5VU3vq27MTtkcRSVoPoRC0D 3Qo6dPKk+I3g6TVQ4ewBt4IXeEWUOj1uEziGsPEuxsj5JuK36gRwpZ68RYnxT+zRrSLF x0tfCtZcHGzrH6Vx5a3v+gf2FYEjCoTxbqb9mZETQUk2hAxV9rjAqks98D9wkVnWjkbv gToaB2JoGouIt1luVu+D05tmpLaYjLfZcC2zNvAgkxPFQ28xTuoFo0OZR8zE9laQnONe aV5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1763658970; x=1764263770; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=DQCAZWoLamFDdu3fmKZ+XLcJj7es9nLbSERdIXdM9GI=; b=C4HTHj1L31I9afzTdvPC7LiKLbwL7gQPSMrh+TAqYxgdy05Ga3XP96GuUm0VfcDylA zUB9UoWjdELWXwmcYivlou7y+PqGVZCZLA15R1Eh1R6bZecxJAPvtVIp6wFgVukA45vY KJR7wukjdFinmyfNEiywmstOwZNBGHARJ7KJnVkcQrpkXDt4Z/PxXEOuF5Y91er6UDO+ 0B1bhZxCFKMJ/i0SrtvvexAbn0frx1VI+BuJOjgoamJaGYydQoVU5858sEKYKO4rvFsN 5gDbFWT0rr4Rb7XW4/qgMYfZdE9Ov9Y8/iArAjhTJKMZTjO8xo2cnlzwISvBxykX0D2M VuVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz1FxNMbZdFsoE1YH68/uIyVo4NVvF73maBjE+EuiolzeYTYPw/ CcfKarzymDupuYHSyc3AbiTKKYfpEpcWDYOy6e/Z8xyY/sx/PPwnT/nE8xyDMknyCEnj8pO5EVO cZy3+iiDRkKLmq0K3Gkl+RBeNF+KfFzuVpg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctgMGVoo9xGwWfTGeXxJzF8weYTk0AvAzyhi3rvf8A7HJXq8YRdfRJFclL111a xA0/XtgZRBRAGaHb8VLapxg177ex2+Wb0OlviW5AyrSeLnOYfBnh0GonN8fUOKKE+Q2KBjtckDy mZLeWVAZUSSlH4dEg94s6mG3N/+NBYfDh3C6jinjqpVhbjtag4f1Rl5rqFkQwNcIYPW1bXb/U0a 4CCL3UYcPvWu0XtuP1QW1/lTRNGIwZhID9cwWJrKASxijBLZ2Qk2R351rMFMYojUeoYk+7g X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGrpuO+gKIQByK/kM38/tdK11QBPPhQNUHG8kj8wPEkk91gxtN01Dlff7tbeWWOYzhdUbR9mJXuRa51yzkd5zc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:c1f7:b0:450:bc64:d159 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-450ff3d818amr1743088b6e.54.1763658970280; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:16:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ron Johnson Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:15:59 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bkfEhrs6-UWbqIZrAtRVVDcdghXnp_JvuNvIxk0JjflZGMwlOrK8Gkp89s Message-ID: Subject: Re: Barman was hung after a Transport endpoint error To: pgsql-admin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006db664064409da4b" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --0000000000006db664064409da4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 9:29=E2=80=AFAM Sri Mrudula Attili = wrote: > Hello Team, > > > This is regarding our Barman backup host, which seems like hung for 5 > days with no backup, streaming, cron etc happening. > > We have checkmk monitoring that notifies us if any one of the parameters > of Barman check fail, but we havent hot any events from checkmk as barman > check was showing all OK and no FAILED. > > What do you explain this situation in Barman. > > > *To provide further details about the issue:* > > - We user Data Domain as barman backup home for storage. > - On 5th November data domain endpoints is not connect but the mount > was still up on the host. We still dont know from the data domain side= what > caused this issue. > - Barman log has errors* : [2800226] barman.cli ERROR: [Errno 107] > Transport endpoint is not connected: > '/nfs/DDbackup/pgsql-****-****/.active-model.auto'* > - If the end point was missing barman should fail completely and the > checks should fail as well, Which in turn would have helped us to iden= tify > the issue immediately. > - The only way we figured out that there was an issue, on November > 11th one of barman backup maximum age parameter failed saying that wee= ks > backup dint happen. > - Upon checking why the backups failed etc, I went to barman logs and > found out that all this time until the endpoint issue resolved barman = was > not doing the barman checks or barman check was hung at a state > > *Below are the configuration details:* > > - Barman version : 3.10.0 Barman by EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com= ) > - Postgresql version: (PostgreSQL) 16.9 > - Number of hosts configured: 26 > - Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.10 > > Is NFS hung? --=20 Death to , and butter sauce. Don't boil me, I'm still alive. lobster! --0000000000006db664064409da4b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 9:29=E2=80=AFAM S= ri Mrudula Attili <sri@ebi.ac.uk>= ; wrote:
=20 =20 =20

Hello Team,


=C2=A0This is regarding our Barman backup host, which seems like hung for 5 days with no backup, streaming, cron etc happening.

=C2=A0We have checkmk monitoring that notifies us if any one of the parameters of Barman check fail, but we havent hot any events from checkmk as barman check was showing all OK and no FAILED.

What do you explain this situation in Barman.


To provide further details about the issue:

  • We user Data Domain as barman backup home for storage.
  • On 5th November data domain endpoints is not connect but the mount was still up on the host. We still dont know from the data domain side what caused this issue.
  • Barman log has errors : [2800226] barman.cli ERROR: [Errno 107] Transport endpoint is not connected: '/nfs/DDbackup/pgsql-****-****/.active-model.auto'
  • If the end point was missing barman should fail completely and the checks should fail as well, Which in turn would have helped us to identify the issue immediately.
  • The only way we figured out that there was an issue, on November 11th one of barman backup maximum age parameter failed saying that weeks backup dint happen.
  • Upon checking why the backups failed etc, I went to barman logs and found out that all this time until the endpoint issue resolved barman was not doing the barman checks or barman check was hung at a state

Below are the configuration details:

  • Barman version : 3.10.0 Barman by EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com)
  • Postgresql version: (PostgreSQL) 16.9
  • Number of hosts configured: 26
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.10=C2=A0

Is NFS hung?
--
Death to <Redacted>, and= butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<= ;Redacted> lobster!
--0000000000006db664064409da4b--