Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028BE1337B81 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:02:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14474-06 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:02:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:19:48.063434 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.kickstone.com (smtp.kickstone.co.uk [87.194.183.70]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049A71337B7E for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:02:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from 87-194-183-69.dsl.cnl.uk.net ([87.194.183.69]:2660 helo=MADRAS2) by mail.kickstone.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PgQci-0002Sa-4J; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:42:32 +0000 Message-ID: Reply-To: "John Lister" From: "John Lister" To: "Tom Lane" Cc: References: <927BF3A3F54247FF8C63219A00CE98B5@squarepi.com> <1427.1295651046@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2081.1295653238@sss.pgh.pa.us> Subject: Re: Should autovacuum do a database wide vacuum near transaction limit? Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:42:31 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.438 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_40=-0.001, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.439 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201101/145 X-Sequence-Number: 36585 > "John Lister" writes: >> On another bizarre note, A database wide vacuum has just finished, but >> I'm >> still getting the warnings: > >> GMT WARNING: database "backend" must be vacuumed within 10205310 >> transactions > > Did you do that vacuum as a superuser? yes John