Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UefgV-00055F-OK for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 06:04:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UefgV-0003Ix-7t for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 06:04:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UefgT-0003IZ-ON for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 06:04:30 +0000 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UefgR-0000r0-LE for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 06:04:29 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id fa10so353146pad.33 for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 23:04:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=dXjj1ITZDDNPBViWKN4tMO/5TAFfIyh2rXgCyYZuAyc=; b=GuFvZx2EEJIKcaeHYh7g3mwOTZOWv9ipXEN5AV9s0n6KnY6zZmMQgLRT6Ac0zv2SLi 9gzyg8dJAI9juKFVPG7G0LMmIT+YQSz7AMEh6uCdlXeOJyazYBCVpYihJhlTGYVaE1sM 8NmY14W9ol7A2OvLSdXRN6MAzzQ/uRvPQIiLGCJzGstXZbOgxJdz4rclEzLatpuqSTw4 ET6LJvtZMcUkXbALzsgU6GQcib+kcRQBzNAoqyYgiRR3+Q6tuv3VhVlATzOY1Bvq0QY1 uSXDLOKcNYjmYCbcpm3Pe3b9kiXeXWzJmEsqW3Drb+ERw3orkBX6bV2Cu4A532Xw6rOX ILAg== X-Received: by 10.68.218.34 with SMTP id pd2mr973801pbc.204.1369116266555; Mon, 20 May 2013 23:04:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([122.177.226.8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gc5sm1342400pbb.19.2013.05.20.23.04.13 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 20 May 2013 23:04:25 -0700 (PDT) References: <519B0C04.8070102@hogranch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <519B0C04.8070102@hogranch.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Cc: "pgsql-general@postgresql.org" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A523) From: Atri Sharma Subject: Re: ODBC constructs Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:34:10 +0530 To: John R Pierce X-Pg-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org Sent from my iPad On 21-May-2013, at 11:24, John R Pierce wrote: =20 > libpq lets you talk directly to postgres in its native tongue. >=20 > ODBC implements a sort of abstraction. IMHO, its like trying to type = with mittens on. >=20 Also,I see no point in working using ODBC with Postgres if you want to work= in C,when libpq is available.IMHO,it is like adding an extra layer without any purpose,or I ma= y be wrong here. Also,is it only me,or are we all a bit wary of ODBC? I think JDBC is becomi= ng the standard now(of course,its Java,but as I said, you should use libpq = if you want to write native code for Postgres). Regards, Atri --=20 Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general