Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 18:07:52 +0700
From: Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability
Message-ID: <YCJtCOi+M7F1aN04@admin.sibptus.ru>
References: <YB0VuB8RJAKvTI6+@admin.sibptus.ru>
 <CANNMO++t7hLG2Uk-M61ohXGNhBYszSPL8vn=zP09tcRv15QB4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <YCDKyYzrv4HQZz9t@admin.sibptus.ru>
 <7377779A-6763-415E-B132-0998957626FA@yandex-team.ru>
 <YCJgKTHY2pbPnWZj@admin.sibptus.ru>
 <E9DEC4D3-66CA-4F67-9481-301B9B140124@yandex-team.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <E9DEC4D3-66CA-4F67-9481-301B9B140124@yandex-team.ru>
Precedence: bulk

Andrey Borodin wrote:
> 
> 
> > 9 февр. 2021 г., в 15:12, Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> написал(а):
> > 
> > I'm considering WAL-G now, not as a backup solution per se, but as an
> > advanced WAL archiver which can:
> Keep in mind that once upon a time you will have to delete WAL segments. If you just use wal-g delete you have to point our which backup to keep.

Thank you, this is an important note.

> 
> > 1. Upload/download WALs directly to S3
> > 
> > 2. Verify WALs integrity (a very nice feature, but I think does not work
> > if there are no backups)
> If will not be alarmed if WALs before backup are missing. Though it should still analyze chains correctly.
> 
> > 3. Prevent WAL overwrite (does it work?)
> I think so.
> 

OK.

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/