public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
pg_split_walfile_name
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* pg_split_walfile_name
@ 2025-07-31 08:08 Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]>
  2025-08-12 17:34 ` Re: pg_split_walfile_name Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Fabrice Chapuis @ 2025-07-31 08:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected]

Hi,

In the documentation, PostgreSQL: Documentation: 17: 9.28. System
Administration Functions
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-admin.html;, I do not
understand the position 100C in the wal filename and how the result could
be C001?

Any idea?

Regards,

Fabrice

pg_split_walfile_name is useful to compute a LSN from a file offset and WAL
file name, for example:

postgres=# \set file_name '000000010000000100C000AB'
postgres=# \set offset 256
postgres=# SELECT '0/0'::pg_lsn + pd.segment_number * ps.setting::int
+ :offset AS lsn
  FROM pg_split_walfile_name(:'file_name') pd,
       pg_show_all_settings() ps
  WHERE ps.name = 'wal_segment_size';
      lsn
---------------
 C001/AB000100
(1 row)


^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: pg_split_walfile_name
  2025-07-31 08:08 pg_split_walfile_name Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]>
@ 2025-08-12 17:34 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  2025-08-13 10:06   ` Re: pg_split_walfile_name Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2025-08-12 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:08:25AM +0200, Fabrice Chapuis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In the documentation, PostgreSQL: Documentation: 17: 9.28. System
> Administration Functions, I do not understand the position 100C in the wal
> filename and how the result could be C001?
> 
> Any idea?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Fabrice
> 
> pg_split_walfile_name is useful to compute a LSN from a file offset and WAL
> file name, for example:
> 
> postgres=# \set file_name '000000010000000100C000AB'
> postgres=# \set offset 256
> postgres=# SELECT '0/0'::pg_lsn + pd.segment_number * ps.setting::int + :offset AS lsn
>   FROM pg_split_walfile_name(:'file_name') pd,
>        pg_show_all_settings() ps
>   WHERE ps.name = 'wal_segment_size';
>       lsn
> ---------------
>  C001/AB000100
> (1 row)

I think your problem is that you are converting the WAL segment/offset
to a number of bytes by multiplying by wal_segment_size, and then you
are casting it to an LSN, which assumes time line/segment number;  try
this:

	SELECT to_hex((pd.segment_number * ps.setting::int + :offset)::bigint) AS lsn
	  FROM pg_split_walfile_name(:'file_name') pd,
	       pg_show_all_settings() ps
	  WHERE ps.name = 'wal_segment_size';
	     lsn
	--------------
	 c001ab000100


-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: pg_split_walfile_name
  2025-07-31 08:08 pg_split_walfile_name Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]>
  2025-08-12 17:34 ` Re: pg_split_walfile_name Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
@ 2025-08-13 10:06   ` Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: Fabrice Chapuis @ 2025-08-13 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]

select * FROM pg_split_walfile_name(:'file_name') pd;
+-[ RECORD 1 ]---+----------+
| segment_number | 12583339 |
| timeline_id    | 1        |
+----------------+----------+

Yes, number of sgements 12583339 correspond to  C001AB in hexdecimal

thanks for answering

Fabrice

On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 7:34 PM Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:08:25AM +0200, Fabrice Chapuis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the documentation, PostgreSQL: Documentation: 17: 9.28. System
> > Administration Functions, I do not understand the position 100C in the
> wal
> > filename and how the result could be C001?
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Fabrice
> >
> > pg_split_walfile_name is useful to compute a LSN from a file offset and
> WAL
> > file name, for example:
> >
> > postgres=# \set file_name '000000010000000100C000AB'
> > postgres=# \set offset 256
> > postgres=# SELECT '0/0'::pg_lsn + pd.segment_number * ps.setting::int +
> :offset AS lsn
> >   FROM pg_split_walfile_name(:'file_name') pd,
> >        pg_show_all_settings() ps
> >   WHERE ps.name = 'wal_segment_size';
> >       lsn
> > ---------------
> >  C001/AB000100
> > (1 row)
>
> I think your problem is that you are converting the WAL segment/offset
> to a number of bytes by multiplying by wal_segment_size, and then you
> are casting it to an LSN, which assumes time line/segment number;  try
> this:
>
>         SELECT to_hex((pd.segment_number * ps.setting::int +
> :offset)::bigint) AS lsn
>           FROM pg_split_walfile_name(:'file_name') pd,
>                pg_show_all_settings() ps
>           WHERE ps.name = 'wal_segment_size';
>              lsn
>         --------------
>          c001ab000100
>
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        https://momjian.us
>   EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com
>
>   Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
>


^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-13 10:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-31 08:08 pg_split_walfile_name Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]>
2025-08-12 17:34 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2025-08-13 10:06   ` Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox