Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 14:32:45 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
	pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: List traffic
In-Reply-To: <1273598624-sup-3654@alvh.no-ip.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1005111431310.85296@hub.org>
References: <201005111350.o4BDo4x27597@momjian.us>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1005111054340.85296@hub.org>
	<1273598624-sup-3654@alvh.no-ip.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Tue, 11 May 2010, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Excerpts from Marc G. Fournier's message of mar may 11 09:58:34 -0400 2010:
>
>> If list traffic, especially on -hackers, is getting so large, should we
>> look at maybe splitting it?  I could easily enough split things such that
>> I duplicate the subscriber list, so nobody would have to subscribe, but it
>> would make it easier for ppl to filter their incoming ... ?
>
> Maybe we could create a separate list where people would send patches,
> and keep patchless discussion on -hackers?
>
> Just a thought ;-)

The thing is, it seems to me, especially now that we have such strong 
commit fests, that we should have a seperate form for 'design phase' then 
for 'reivew discusions' ... *shrug*

There may be some that are interested in what is being implemented, but 
don't really care about how it was implemented ...

----
Marc G. Fournier                        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy@hub.org                                     http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy    Skype: hub.org    ICQ:7615664    MSN:scrappy@hub.org