Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062D063288C for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 10:28:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98306-07 for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 13:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0079463285E for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 10:28:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2043034559BF for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 10:28:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98607-02; Thu, 13 May 2010 13:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 9F179345592B; Thu, 13 May 2010 10:27:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2E534558C9; Thu, 13 May 2010 10:27:56 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:27:56 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Magnus Hagander cc: Greg Stark , Robert Haas , Alvaro Herrera , Bruce Momjian , Simon Riggs , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: List traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201005111350.o4BDo4x27597@momjian.us> <1273598624-sup-3654@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201005/669 X-Sequence-Number: 162332 On Thu, 13 May 2010, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> On Wed, 12 May 2010, Greg Stark wrote: >> >>> I'm thinking I'll move -general (and the useless -novice) to another folder. But I'm left wondering what to do with -admin and -performance. They're a random mix of user content and developer content. I'll probably move them along with -general but that means I won't be likely to see any development discussion on them in the future >> >> There shouldn't be any dev discussions on them as it is ... that isn't their mandate ... those are/were meant to be end-user lists, not developer ones ... > > We know from experience that doesn't work. People just end up > crossposting, because they're not sure people are on both lists. And > then you want to move a discussion, which just means you have to CC in > both lists, leading to even more duplication. > > If there was a clear distinction between end-user and dev it might > make sense. That how commercial software companies tend to work - > don't let devs talk to end users. That's not how we work. Forcing > people to look in different places just throws hurdles in front of > those trying to help out. What *are* you talking about? This doesn't seem to have anything related to what I said :) All I was saying was that -performance and -admin are not development discusion lists, not that developers aren't subscribed / talking on them ... that doesn't make them any less end-user lists ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scrappy@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy@hub.org