Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB435632EF6 for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 17:43:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59803-02 for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 20:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7003632E9D for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 17:43:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE9F34559B2 for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 17:43:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66599-02; Thu, 13 May 2010 20:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6D29D3455944; Thu, 13 May 2010 17:43:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C93D34558C9; Thu, 13 May 2010 17:43:22 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 17:43:22 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Magnus Hagander cc: Greg Stark , Robert Haas , Alvaro Herrera , Bruce Momjian , Simon Riggs , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: List traffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201005111350.o4BDo4x27597@momjian.us> <1273598624-sup-3654@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201005/694 X-Sequence-Number: 162357 On Thu, 13 May 2010, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> My thought had been a split along the lines of major components of the server ... for instance, a totally seperate list for HS related issues, so that, if nothing else, those 'lurkers' that are only interested in developments on that front could be there but not on the main stream -hackers ... almost like seperate working groups ... > > We tried that with pgsql-hackers-win32 and iirc also > pgsql-hackers-pitr, and it was a big failure... But, we are doing that now with pgsql-cluster-hackers and it looks to be working quite well from what I can see ... guess it depends on if ppl want it to fail in the first place or not *shrug* It also depends if a clear line can be drawn and adhered to ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scrappy@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy@hub.org