Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:42:30 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
	Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
Subject: Re: List traffic
In-Reply-To: <4BED31F30200002500031751@gw.wicourts.gov>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1005141442040.22297@hub.org>
References: <e3e99c85032a806a93a73ea8e5f3b6ab@biglumber.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1005141138590.22297@hub.org><alpine.BSF.2.00.1005141138590.22297@hub.org>
	<25805.1273850482@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<4BED31F30200002500031751@gw.wicourts.gov>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Fri, 14 May 2010, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> Well, redoubling our current efforts to direct people to more
> specific lists would accomplish nothing, since doubling zero leaves
> you with zero.  The description of -general includes:

Agreed ...

> Given that, the fact that -admin, -novice, -sql, and -performance 
> collectively get as many posts as -general suggests that people are, in 
> fact, making some effort to find a list which seems a good fit. Perhaps 
> if the description of -general was changed to suggest it *was* a 
> catch-all for posts which don't fit the other lists, things would 
> improve.

Can you offer improvd / stronger wording on this ... ?

Marc G. Fournier                        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy@hub.org                                     http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy    Skype: hub.org    ICQ:7615664    MSN:scrappy@hub.org