Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57B5633271 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 16:10:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95389-05-2; Fri, 14 May 2010 19:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF82632EC0; Fri, 14 May 2010 16:10:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB33C34559F3; Fri, 14 May 2010 16:10:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40229-03; Fri, 14 May 2010 19:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 39BA534559F0; Fri, 14 May 2010 16:10:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3946034559EE; Fri, 14 May 2010 16:10:17 -0300 (ADT) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 16:10:17 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Josh Berkus cc: pgsql-chat@postgresql.org Subject: Re: List traffic In-Reply-To: <4BED7F7F.6000703@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: References: <4BED7F7F.6000703@agliodbs.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201005/783 X-Sequence-Number: 162446 On Fri, 14 May 2010, Josh Berkus wrote: > First off, this is absolutely the wrong list to be discussing management of > PostgreSQL lists. That belongs on pgsql-www. Actually, this is as good a list as any ... -www is for WWW related issues, not mailing list ... be as inappropriate there as it would be on sysadmins, which also doesn't cover mailing lists ... > Second, regarding advocacy: no, absolutely not. -advocacy is a working list > and not a virtual water cooler. BTW, and even I totally forgot about it, but we do have a virtual water cooler already: pgsql-chat ... 224 subscribers currently, just nobody uses it ... In fact, I just removed / changed to BCC -hackers so that all further discussions on this part of the thread will be on -chat ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scrappy@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy@hub.org