Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bv4qf-0000Qn-TI for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:56:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bv4qf-0003Ho-BR for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:56:41 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bv4ow-0007t3-Pj for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:54:54 +0000 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bv4ou-0007XS-59 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:54:53 +0000 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C985B207BF; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:54:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:54:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=Vl26twX+j7hMHVx WSki8Ub2pFxw=; b=egBiHoui5Rv56w/xLFBNPyvOQ4hsBfDf64lHbxy+9/it8aN 74JS5Rk0dadDVNb2YAbTqlRG4p/Lfc+QFToZZjkUPpW5Z+0I+3LbflrKix5OJO4G 8GvT5rfaopFxZPyhIDeNIa0T1o1wL97miJn9SfoAQ/J4ar0C5Ba44C9iHcXQ= X-Sasl-enc: cn8qqHWKOHKDk8gkyrbHfnRJ89aieljRhgByMsZ7C/HR 1476460490 Received: from april.local (c-73-13-66-39.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.13.66.39]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 854CFCC0BC; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:54:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Is Bi-Directional Replication (BDR) is fully integrated into PostgreSQL 9.6 or 9.7? To: Alex Balashov , pgsql-admin@postgresql.org References: <65e5ea5e-f45b-b350-55f8-a164a6a94e77@evaristesys.com> From: Peter Eisentraut Organization: 2ndQuadrant Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 11:54:50 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <65e5ea5e-f45b-b350-55f8-a164a6a94e77@evaristesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org On 10/12/16 3:10 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: > I had the same question as Ravi, actually: is it likely that we're going > to see BDR (or at least, the master-master aspect) fully mainlined in 9.7? We are working on getting logical replication into the next PostgreSQL release (version 10), but it's not going to be master-master. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin