Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A6764FCCA for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:43:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01363-09 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:43:28 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D004264FCC0 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:43:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so3054679wfc.28 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:43:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=cpz7fx/2nT+8vor4Hzbp9TuBLBUck8qjLckx+r4vF2I=; b=CLNorZ9MdN9O6E5pJf5NyHvBoYQPz90ongxYoJfJ8DgCODQ50I5eIkSu6zoOMgmXIF 1uOw5CzFXDhJEDNzScjec0Sw0hxczcBOFHfKEi5kGtyw13VDbiJCiIKLF3ZEASkXnNQY 9OwThSj2NJ1BxjkuItrdfpK2eEDYjNiHaFITI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=nWLWvb88+mnMSadSC+RQBaxMI6BCXuBw3icxf1WakyFAf1nswNV2L/Y5QWtcUMD5ox S1jcMeyN0zaphgQ/+JdHheytqS1U8xMH94YJHAOEZqeuOUYHlVuvkbgoTuwCIUAPPh+4 BJiF74fcebBZs9TrMgYItlpAEhAPrRStgv+9Y= Received: by 10.140.166.21 with SMTP id o21mr6563240rve.254.1221662606804; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.74.11 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:43:26 -0600 From: "Scott Marlowe" To: Vivek_Sharan Subject: Re: Heavy postgres process Cc: "Guido Barosio" , "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" In-Reply-To: <5465CC59A600E2408FFBF84350B9383450F4933E18@AUSMELMBX01.ad.infosys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5465CC59A600E2408FFBF84350B938345031E95B93@AUSMELMBX01.ad.infosys.com> <5465CC59A600E2408FFBF84350B9383450F4933AB6@AUSMELMBX01.ad.infosys.com> <5465CC59A600E2408FFBF84350B9383450F4933C33@AUSMELMBX01.ad.infosys.com> <5465CC59A600E2408FFBF84350B9383450F4933E11@AUSMELMBX01.ad.infosys.com> <5465CC59A600E2408FFBF84350B9383450F4933E18@AUSMELMBX01.ad.infosys.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200809/172 X-Sequence-Number: 30265 On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Vivek_Sharan wrote: > Yes that's true and that's planned. We will migrate to Oracle. But as of now need some pointers on solving the problem in hand. Well, updating to the latest 7.4 version would be a very very good move. There are some very real and nasty data loss bugs in 7.4.5. It's an in place update that requires only a few minutes of downtime. I would guess you've got something like sort_mem set too high. P.s. If you think PostgreSQL is hard to troubleshoot, I can't wait to see you running Oracle.