Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826A437B9D9 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:28:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04686-01 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:28:55 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.232]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881B437B9AD for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:28:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so4044468rvf.43 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:28:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=aeFe0bX8pC+ohB9zmJaBURqy/YieL3kZ5BuS/Ub1C00=; b=BpK3YXBHPQixs0va8i4BDKal7U34RBk0RL0o+Vv9zpAu8KngXovyQ8nH8K55Txqy6f 8ruDSgIjX+fGpq570hVmrRv9BdmXSXfyeQfDuDnf6WBOeyFurvTWkPGwHyGl/bB7lf9l dYoixTZo7E+ls3dE7fc4/xUEO+3ohT1AqMZy4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=YMxtwvTf5qaHT9Y8fExus6lb5dBawg8Rwcr9I3RVFCNJdSdJWQPoR2kJ1RR1qQcI/L gAGHXo2IKVu1sVuRNuO6q/+6v56W2fL9zc5lHnsZL25HHMJHIhCUEkEpABQUNnF7KoQ2 Hz9J7LjHKfcAasbkvD/021n8XDEUypZWui1jQ= Received: by 10.141.29.18 with SMTP id g18mr5299735rvj.162.1223490534374; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.248.12 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:28:54 -0600 From: "Scott Marlowe" To: "Martin Badie" Subject: Re: replication with table add/removes.. Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <103015.29150.qm@web59907.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <103015.29150.qm@web59907.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.899 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FS_REPLICA=1.179, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA=0.72 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200810/62 X-Sequence-Number: 30518 On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Martin Badie wrote: > Hi, > > I have a system that have constant table adds/removes are present. I want to > make a replication between master and slaves but not sure which one is the > best solution for that kind of a situation. Since I am new to replication > stuff on postgresql I am truly lost but I know that Slony is not an answer > for replications where table add/remove are present. I think that pgpool might work for this. There are probably some other "front end" type replication systems that would work too.