Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC67633756 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:48:53 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29267-08 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:48:50 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-gx0-f176.google.com (mail-gx0-f176.google.com [209.85.217.176]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A96A63317C for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:48:50 -0400 (AST) Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so693319gxk.19 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:48:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YT00zF7BTSq0eyFIYRBZpGvIpyt4kpPhQQ35VEKWyhg=; b=JtpxoFypvm9P7WTqLeluN3DI2zK+qEGJXeueFZEAJQhCMGQWvIYtgEPX4Z8N8dSavU 5cGLeQ14hyNYhdIhnD/xmNqCb835kjpIs84aLgW7kSU7eSiOlLZx0Vz5gvyMJKPnCLlz 7xxZxHshV/9wwg3hS3QGiUruBamfDmCPx8L3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=n1EUTW8TRjA1eCFH52VCdXSt1VupYCweTaARrc01r1KPFnTLFTkPUE+TNuSqm1bY/P luJGzl4oNODLiBvjBDvo4HBYfjihAA3RdSH7F7gxeiw5eoELn3DhURkxi/zO6kt5BWNb UGdT1HlyI6WZvGOtvajk5zk6BXD7eTHW1WiRk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.191.10 with SMTP id o10mr558562ybf.179.1235602129115; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:48:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <96E0A3B9-4860-4151-BEE2-1B5983D3434F@satshot.com> References: <96E0A3B9-4860-4151-BEE2-1B5983D3434F@satshot.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:48:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Replicating between different Slony versions? From: Scott Marlowe To: Avi Blackmore Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.899 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FS_REPLICA=1.179, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA=0.72 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200902/218 X-Sequence-Number: 31439 On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Avi Blackmore wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm working on migrating our database cluster from PostgreSQL 8.1 to 8.3. > =A0I'm following the "dump and restore, then use Slony to replicate" > procedure, to minimize downtime. =A0The problem is, the new 2.0 version o= f > Slony-I does not support anything prior to 8.3, so I have to install > different versions of Slony-I. Not sure that will work. or if it does if it will work properly. > My question is, is this even feasible? =A0Or would I be better off instal= ling > Slony-I 1.x on my 8.3 cluster, and then upgrading it after the migration? Ding! That's what I'd do. > I ask first because I am extremely skittish about experimenting with a > production database cluster. =A0:-) I'd make a backup, restore it to a test server, and start testing. I am pretty protective of my production servers as well. Testing is the only way to see your problems ahead of time.