Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB44763247B for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 11:10:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79735-02 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 14:10:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zql.com (3a.1f.de.static.xlhost.com [206.222.31.58]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C94663217E for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 11:10:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by zql.com with smtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1OCvay-0003BO-E9; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:10:32 -0400 From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: List traffic X-PGP-Key: 2529 DF6A B8F7 9407 E944 45B4 BC9B 9067 1496 4AC8 X-Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 In-Reply-To: <1273790358.8624.3132.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:10:32 -0000 X-Mailer: JoyMail 2.4.0 Message-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201005/754 X-Sequence-Number: 162417 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > There is no reason why advocacy can't happen on general. Theoretically > www could be on hackers (although I do see the point of a separate > list). I don't feel as strong about -advocacy being removed, but we certainly can fold in -sql and -admin. Would anyone argue against rolling those two (sql and admin) into -general as a first step? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201005141009 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkvtWbgACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjfAQCg0s9GxUIKnxHjbAWd2XOWxYpk OZMAni62Fpj/PPTE9/qFUNw08une4YgT =OyI0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----