Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D331335CB7 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 03:39:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26641-07 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 06:39:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6009C1335B36 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 03:39:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Owr4c-0001tr-77 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:38:58 +0200 Received: from ppp-188-174-72-91.dynamic.mnet-online.de ([188.174.72.91]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:38:58 +0200 Received: from spam_eater by ppp-188-174-72-91.dynamic.mnet-online.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:38:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org From: Thomas Kellerer Subject: Re: question about HA in PG 9.0 Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:38:51 +0200 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <232B5217AD58584C87019E8933556D110214AB147C@redmx2.esri.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-188-174-72-91.dynamic.mnet-online.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <232B5217AD58584C87019E8933556D110214AB147C@redmx2.esri.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/115 X-Sequence-Number: 35659 Kasia Tuszynska wrote on 18.09.2010 01:30: > 1. The doc is lovely but all of the examples are for linux, has > anyone tired a Hot Standby streaming scenario on windows? Any issues > specific to windows? I know that linux and windows environments > “should” behave the same but actually running in both of those > environments exposes many differences. I had no problem setting up a proof-of-concept on my Windows laptop with streaming replication and both instances running on my computer. The batch files needed were quite simple. Regards Thomas