Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F04632982 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:04:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41175-02 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:04:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com [209.85.220.225]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED2C6327E6 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:04:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so203fxm.3 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:04:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LROI1eFkcs4ve68iXCfZ74iQPQfF/Z/xeJSxycywPPw=; b=OTkJggLLwBTB7obHwCFJYxzALGN8XTsi+IEW/3LR4FdxmSfNoJDbFGJOyH2uo6BhPu UW9RLkVo27TNRGQMCZfbMI4vATXbFtBe2y2sakAdLFw6JSH3Zy/syZu6gMB+gLbXy+Bk BoronRT7/kTBkWxI/6VvMdUBVxdcDHlJ3fRXc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=RKEv82W9TmXMjm9zdeH8y65oXwAMDIktSEVVVEvWdcH8JabpuvYGDyZV6+KP3uKG+f LvCGV5aVuJrTVCRKOdNyHif6l9DntwhE7XkwmdFaPSLcagckOhdK2B3RWNk56Zl7NSVn 5JyGYqSzVwHCOE4Sfg+A2JBJhY+Jk/tN2cBuI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.228.19 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:03:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:03:14 -0400 Received: by 10.102.243.22 with SMTP id q22mr200946muh.9.1270738994245; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warning From: Jonathan Foy To: Greg Stark Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636417c495aaffd0483bafa81 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.098 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201004/89 X-Sequence-Number: 34183 --001636417c495aaffd0483bafa81 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Greg Stark wrote: > > If you're on 8.1 it's important to be on the latest 8.1 -- there are > at least 17 significant bugs that warranted bug-fix releases between > 8.1.3 and 8.1.20 including security bugs and data corruption bugs. > Understood. It's my current top priority. > > > We never actually ran 8.4.0. We went straight from 8.3.3 to 8.4.1. I > did a > > full dump/restore from the 8.3.3 database into the 8.4.1 database (using > the > > 8.4 pg_dump), partitioning as I went. > > Ugh, then it sounds like there's a real as-yet unidentified problem. > > The other thing to check before panicking is, has this server ever run > with fsync off and crashed (either kernel panic or power failure)? > I have never turned off fsync. Also, the server is showing an uptime of 281 days, and the postgres instance has been up since 2/21. > > What does the storage system on this server look like? Are they IDE or > SCSI drives? Is there an LVM layer involved? etc. > > -- > greg > Storage is on an NFS mounted Fiber Netapp volume. Let me know if you need more... --001636417c495aaffd0483bafa81 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable