Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKjvC-0006zu-8S for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:50:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKjvB-00023j-5D for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:50:53 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKjvA-00021l-6C for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:50:52 +0000 Received: from resqmta-c1p-024060.sys.comcast.net ([2001:558:fd00:56::3]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKjv7-0004R0-3L for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:50:50 +0000 Received: from resomta-c1p-023409.sys.comcast.net ([96.102.18.228]) by resqmta-c1p-024060.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id KiAipHCL8eG0qKjv3pCDyi; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:50:45 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1674669045; bh=B+NeVsUPpL7vmiufHWQ4bn+pbQd8iiawLxynxb88OjQ=; h=Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Xfinity-Spam-Result; b=RraHpj9wjPGeAglPzLF9KXlNJAq8mRASF1xCSN0AGjYZWg7ToKORHjE4YR8j+FRCJ /z03/h0Q+TgoYro/9uBb8NeFS91qx9/PgkftP9LId1mYcIGyF5gbVjWQCD/pw93jRL 8VwoYkHcVe+gBtg+yfU4mC0U2MlYoxUAUHADPV9L7CkAuyXqwu5+lsbShJHZnvlzyA MjKcBQ6js2how0xCNtj/pEkWXFQW89enf6BxjbEprXENKlmPFop4oTHGuwR34B5rCA +YLyDgZgR6T+Q5992wY3KU/zKuf+ZvnrW6hvb+aolSEyiE1fn1pSU2FlcaStk9/iQm r4j/reJ8BAa6g== Received: from R9N0YC2TC3.localdomain ([IPv6:2601:249:8780:7950:fd85:63d2:464f:61ea]) by resomta-c1p-023409.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id Kjv1pXSfLJHanKjv2pfhei; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:50:45 +0000 X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit Received: by R9N0YC2TC3.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 503) id 42F071195E2A; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:42 -0600 (CST) From: Jerry Sievers To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Does raising maintenance_work_mem get seen by an already running aucovac? Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:42 -0600 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Groovy admins, This is on Pg11 (shameful, I know !). There's a long running anti-wrap autovac that we'd rather let finish but on the server instance, I found maintenance_work_mem rather low and thus raised it in postgresql.comf, reloaded and confirmed that my interactive session saw the change. Can a running autovac make use of this or should I either wait it out or cancel and let it restart when ready? The vacuum progress view shows that it's finished the heap and I guess toast, but is now working through the indexes. Thx