Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F049632793 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:08:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98006-05 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:08:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-iw0-f187.google.com (mail-iw0-f187.google.com [209.85.223.187]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90969632349 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:08:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: by iwn17 with SMTP id 17so2185267iwn.19 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:08:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=w0NLVoGDglGX+JxduFJjjqYnJb4UqPonkciBOu6XHkE=; b=tspzcBCp9wH7AyYUHeL2VuiJDs/siHcpDSjqh9/F3f/xdZ5quqFt/rweuwv1+jD1dp c1gkJ03kYk3jb3oD8cXeu5WNjSg/TfEh9jfLSsqGO3vNIEYCPRuNg68jiIgg2hwpdN1q sEvpzh2J3SUwuj0WY9bp8F4uhbqlmH+IFPAHk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qaAG3kGai1CDfgb1AkEALojAaMQCdYJqnqlr2R+Kz0r5OABprpRp4lFl6EQ0GV0l4O 2d0MWnNe5MB49Ctum5Z6c46hg6YGaxyspv/kuB/TIiemc1BN7OAYladPvaow+XesmgvO TCUcYDNDFEf8b7ymvGelpeAvwb3whdJRfo8a4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.11.66 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:08:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BC9F464.20901@pinpointresearch.com> References: <4BC9F464.20901@pinpointresearch.com> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:08:34 -0400 Received: by 10.231.146.144 with SMTP id h16mr1151034ibv.18.1271534914316; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: pg_restore error From: Bryan White To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=-0.700, BAYES_05=-0.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201004/242 X-Sequence-Number: 34336 > It was unclear from your email how you are creating the dump. Did you create > the dump with the 8.1 or the 8.4 version of pg_dump? When upgrading, the > docs recommend using the newer version of the dump utility: "It is > recommended that you use the pg_dump and pg_dumpall programs from the newer > version of PostgreSQL, to take advantage of any enhancements that might have > been made in these programs. Current releases of the dump programs can read > data from any server version back to 7.0." I messed up. I sent the stderr output of the dump to a text file and never looked at it. There was some sort of deadlock condition on a particular table. Another process tries to drop and recreate a table during the time of the dump. I was using the pg_dump from 8.1. I have now dumped the database with the 8.4 version. It will be a couple hours before I have any results. > How many cores are available on the new server? The new server is a dual socket Nahalem. 8 cores, 16 threads, 48 GB ram, 2 WAL drives in RAID1 and 12 database drives in RAID10. -- Bryan White