Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRRgV-0007PF-FM for pgsql-advocacy@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:29:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRRgU-0000Fa-83 for pgsql-advocacy@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:29:18 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRRgT-0000FT-UB for pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:29:18 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRRgR-0006Um-CA; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:29:16 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRRgM-0003Ik-KY; Thu, 16 May 2019 21:29:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 21:29:10 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Michael Paquier Cc: Peter Geoghegan , Alvaro Herrera , Amit Langote , David Rowley , "Jonathan S. Katz" , PostgreSQL Advocacy Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights Message-ID: <20190517012910.tyyemljldvvo37qj@momjian.us> References: <20190516182628.kbkiajfnlooocgyg@momjian.us> <20190516190806.GA14121@alvherre.pgsql> <20190516235250.GD20887@paquier.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190516235250.GD20887@paquier.xyz> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 08:52:50AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:35:25PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:08 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> I don't understand why you want to make things such black boxes. It is > >> what it is, and some users (not all) will want to understand. People > >> who have already tested pg11 and found it insufficient may give pg12 a > > second look if we tell them we have fixed the deficiencies they found. > > > > +1. The major features list should be accessible, but otherwise I > > think that we should add more detail. > > +1. Another thing which may matter is that if some people do not see > some improvements they were expecting then they can come back to pg13 > and help around with having these added. Things are never going to be > perfect for all users, and it makes little sense to make it sound like > things are actually perfect. What changes in the current description would cause people not to retest to see if it is better? If anything, the description is too broad. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +